HISTNEUR-L: The History of Neuroscience Internet Forum


[Previous Posting] [Next Posting]

Re: Animal Spirits to Molecular Mechanisms



To the group:


The following from an article by Mary A. B. Brazier is of general interest,
and may be of particular interest to the author of the forth coming book,
Nerve: From Animal Spirits to Molecular Mechanisms.


"... Muller published ... it [apparently this refers to the publication in
his - Muller's journal - findings against network theory discovered by his
student, Remark} in his journal together with Remak's description of a
"primitive band," within the fiber (what later was to be known as the axis
cylinder). Remak's "primitive band" was not immediately accepted and only
later and after visiting Remak did Purkyne recognize (and name) the axis
cylinder as a structure [the references to the Purkinge publication naming
the axon, appears to be *before* the publication of Remak's paper in
Muller's journal, as given in Brazier's article??]. 


Brazier continues, and this is the *point*,


"This contribution of Remak's *is really a turning point*, since, *by
demonstrating more clearly than had Fontana, it ruled out once and for all
the ancient Galenic concept of the core of the nerve fiber constituting a
hollow channel for a nervus fluid.* [Emphasis Added]

Brazier continues,

"But the opposition was severe, especially from Valentin and Henle, both of
whom eventually relented, but not until the 1840's when the evidence became
overwhelming. Valentin had undertaken the unusual course of founding a
quarterly journal to publish solely his own work. This was called the
Reportortium fur Anatomie und Physiologie and it is in volume 7, published
in 1842, that we find his acceptance of Remak's axis cylinder." 


Architectonics of the Cerebral Cortex, edited by M. A. B. Brazier and H.
Persche, Raven Press, 1978, p. 12-13

So it seems (according to Brazier) that a firm acceptance of a 'solid' (of
solid-like: given mid to late 19th century microscopy)was a principle
advance undermining nervous fluids - and perhaps animal spirits!?


Is this a well recognized conceptual development in the history of
neuroscience?



Andy Lautin
NYU Medical School

<HISTNEUR-L@library.ucla.edu>   [HISTNEUR-L Archives -- Main Index]  [HISTNEUR-L Archives -- 2004 Message Index]